> > If this is the case, the proposal should be so amended. There > > would be no problem running two votes, either in sequence, or > > concurrently.
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 03:35:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > I'll give it very serious consideration, but first I would like some > guidance from you in the form of a reply to Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. I'm not sure what you expect here. http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200311/msg00081.html Seems to posit that there is some specific number of ballots required to resolve the issue of people proposing amendments which do not incorporate text or ideas from the original proposal (or, perhaps, that you find discordant?). And then you go on to ask what the value is for this number. [1] Why is this an issue? [2] Resolve how? [3] Why would you assume that anyone could associate any kind of number with such a vague problem statement? [4] How does "number of ballots" shed any light on anything of any interest to anyone? More fundamentally: this whole thread devolves to some bogus "veto power" which does not exist, and therefore cannot be discussed in a rational fashion: Amendments do not dispose of the original proposal, except with the agreement of the proposer and seconds. -- Raul
