> On Jan 3, 2004, at 21:56, Raul Miller wrote: > > So... back to the point at hand: a "vote about non-free" won't answer > > the question of what we want to do about non-free if the vote doesn't > > address the issues people have about non-free.
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 10:11:47PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > Any option supported by, what is is, 8 developers can go on the ballot. That's not the point of voting, however -- it's a description of one of the steps in the process. > In addition, if you support an option not on the ballot, you can vote > "further discussion." Oddly enough, I am aware of that. -- Raul
