> > 5. Programs that don't meet our free-software standards > > Should this say "Software that doesn't" instead?
Perhaps I missed this in all of the GFDL discussions of the past, but does
documentation == software? If we're cleaning up the social contract, I
wonder if we need to go one step further. "Software and data that does
not", or something else. If it's been agreed that everything that Debian
distributes is software (I can live with that), please disregard.
Thanks,
Dale
--
Dale E. Martin, Clifton Labs, Inc.
Senior Computer Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cliftonlabs.com
pgp key available
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
