"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Raul Miller wrote: > >>> I demostrate how one can start to distribute a program, continue to >>> distribute a program and stop to distribute a program. All three >>> actions do not contradict any ethical rule. >>> If you still think that erasing something from my hard drive (free >>> or non-free) is not ethical, please explain me how. >> I just don't see what this has to do with having debian remove >> non-free. >> Sure, you can remove something from your hard drive. That's not >> equivalent to removing packages in unstable which are there because of >> someone else's work. > > I understand what you are talking about. There are Debain developers > who want Debian to act always ethical, and there are Debian developers > who think it is O.K. to act non-ethical for Debian, for example > because of the work they contribute to non-free.
I feel somewhat insulted there. So me making a non-free package is non-ethical ? so, when I help other to have the ocaml documentation well integrated to there debian documentation system (dwww for example), I'm acting non-ethical ? I DO NOT AGREE THAT THIS IS THE CASE. -- Rémi Vanicat
