> >>The fact, that someone will suffer because of non-free situations > >>which can happen after distribution, can be ignored because we do not > >>care about it.
Raul Miller wrote: > > False. > > > > We do the best we can -- this is the opposite of not caring about it. On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 02:39:36AM +0100, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote: > Do you mean that by distributing non-free we do the best what we can? > Why? Even if we can work on free instead of non-free? When there is no completely free alternative, we distribute the best alternatives available. If you think counter examples exist, please describe them. > Why working on free is not the best what we can? This is like the story about the guy who lost the keys to his car. A friend stopped by to help him search, and after looking for a while asked him where he had dropped the keys. The man explained that he'd dropped the keys a block away, but the light wasn't very good there. -- Raul
