On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 10:52:14PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:31:36PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > > I am confused. Did not several people second earlier versions of your, > > and others', proposals? > > The most any proposal got was 4 seconds. Five would be needed to > introduce an amendment. > > Also, while I personally think my post recent proposal is better, but it's > gotten no seconds. That's certainly not enough to have it introduced. > > I'm somewhat ambivalent about my earlier proposals -- I think they're > better than having no proposal at all, but like I said I prefer my most > recent one (it's simpler and cleaner, in my opinion -- which means it's > less likely to introduce some ambiguity that I've not thought through).
I think the problem is that you got really confusing people by changing every now and then. Maybe some clarification would be good, and once a final version is there, then make a call for a proposal. Friendly, Sven Luther
