On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:26:39PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:34:11AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > I don' think it's a professional attitude if the RM has given up > > talking to the maintainer of xfree86. Please, Anthony, adjust your > > attitude, or ask someone else to be the RM. > > Ah, what I love about Debian is just how _rewarding_ it is to contribute.
Indeed; how do you suppose I felt today when I learned -- apparently
long after the fact -- that the Release Manager had placed an embargo on
his communications with me in that official capacity?
I hadn't suspected it, as you've had no obvious trouble arguing the
"remove non-free" General Resolution or the details of our Standard
Resolution Procedure with me with me on this list (e.g.
[1][2][3][4][5]), or chatting on IRC.
[1] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/debian-vote-200401/msg00973.html
[2] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200311/msg00230.html
[3] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200311/msg00231.html
[4] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200311/msg00148.html
[5] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200310/msg00180.html
--
G. Branden Robinson | If God had intended for man to go
Debian GNU/Linux | about naked, we would have been
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | born that way.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
