On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:29:34PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Anthony Towns <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:36:52PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > > See, there you go again. It's not part of the Debian distribution; > > > > but it's certainly part of the Debian project. Saying categorically and > > > > without clarification that non-free isn't part of "Debian" is exactly > > > > as bad as saying it is part of "Debian". > > > But the Social Contract says it's not part of Debian. Right there, in > > > those words. > > > > Yes, and then it clarifies precisely what it means when it says "Debian" > > -- "the Debian GNU/Linux Distribution". Right there. In those words. > > Actually no, paragraph five doesn't say that.
But paragraph 1 does it. Friendly, Sven Luther
