Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you only like specific parts of a proposal, and there are enough > people who share you viewpoint for it to matter (6 people to second > your proposal) then you just need to propose an amendment > incorporating the parts you like and removing the parts that you > don't.
So, duh, that was the *point* of my suggestion. But I don't have the arrogance to just declare "this is the best way" without hearing discussion, which is what I was trying to invite. Sadly, Debian seems to head for the meta-discussion by a sort of nervous tick. So, can we discuss the different sections separately, and then perhaps replace the current proposals (much of which I do like) with section-by-section consideration, so that we can get each section as good as possible?
