Xavier Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - it was NOT just an editorial change: firmwares are not clearly > against DFSG as they can be viewed as piece of the connected > hardware, *independent* from the architecture/OS (it's just a matter > of transfering data in a flash RAM instead of having it on a ROM - > are we going to ban hardware containing firmwares in RAM and not > hardware containing firmwares in ROM?)
If firmware were part of the connected hardware, it would be part of the hardware, and the kernel wouldn't be loading anything.
