* Michael Banck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040429 11:25]: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 05:17:41PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > For images, fonts, and sounds, he makes an exception for the source > > code requirement. For many of these, there is no sensible source code > > anyway, and so DFSG 2 doesn't require it. That is, the image is > > itself the source code.
> That's a statement I would like to know whether it is accepted by all > the other developers? I think I agree (without having thought this > through a lot), but I was not aware that this was the standard way of > interpreting things, certainly not after the recent dicussions. > > For example, people say that our logo was non-free. Our official logo (that with the bottle) is non-free, because it is not free useable. (Failing DFSG #1, 4, 5, 6, 8.) Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
