On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 12:21:17PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Mon, 3 May 2004 17:28:43 +0100, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Some other comments: > > > * Our Secretary seems to be under the impression that a vote must > > be started within a certain period of a resolution being > > proposed. I don't think this is the case. The discussion period > > quoted in 4.2(4) is a _minimum_. According to A.2(1), it is up > > to the proposer or a sponsor to call for a vote, and there is no > > need to hold a vote until they do so. > > Rubbish. In the case of the last GR, the sponsor had already > called for a vote (twice, in fact, I asked that the vote be delayed > the first time for for technical vote taking rasons, and he agreed).
I don't see the disagreement here. Ian says the secretary need not hold a vote until the proposer or sponsor calls for one. Manoj says the proposer had indeed called for one. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
