-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to formalize what I've already said... > > I think this should be considered for future -private content even if > the GR Proposal 2 (which I second) is rejected, considering one argument > against it is that people didn't expect to have it's private posts > revealed. > > -- > > Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that the process > defined in GR Proposal 2 will be applied *only* for the future content > of debian-private mailing list. > > -- > > To me, it's a second option that would make possible to avoid creating > more un-declassificable material on -private even if the GR Proposal 2 > is rejected. > > daniel I see nothing in the Constitution that prevents me from seconding both aj's and Daniel's proposals, so I second this, too. Please inform me if I'm misguided :) - -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQFDfjiQkuYKi19tgBURAizmAJ99TcGVkvoSPTWINhD/w1xaZURJrACeM/hA sO30sj4VnAhknTLlwaIGYys= =7zKv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
