On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 11:03:03PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Wouter Verhelst: > > First of all, I do think we can, per 4.1.3 (as others have already > > pointed out). However, I don't think that is relevant; "Debian will seek > > to do foo" doesn't mean "Debian will do foo", and "This process will be > > undertaken under the following constraints" means "if done, this is how > > it'll be done". In other words, I don't think it's a violation of the > > text if we eventually end up not doing it. > > Ah, I didn't read it this way, but it makes sense. This means that > the whole thing is basically completely unnecessary because the DPL > could already form a declassification team if he wants.
Well, technically, you're perhaps right. However, I suspect that, due to the highly sensitive nature of the subject, should the DPL indeed do such a thing, a GR to overrule that particular decision will be proposed faster than you can say "declassification". In some cases it's just better to ask people whether everyone agrees rather than to just go ahead and do so. And it's not as if the -private archives are going anywhere, anyway. -- .../ -/ ---/ .--./ / .--/ .-/ .../ -/ ../ -./ --./ / -.--/ ---/ ..-/ .-./ / -/ ../ --/ ./ / .--/ ../ -/ ..../ / -../ ./ -.-./ ---/ -../ ../ -./ --./ / --/ -.--/ / .../ ../ --./ -./ .-/ -/ ..-/ .-./ ./ .-.-.-/ / --/ ---/ .-./ .../ ./ / ../ .../ / ---/ ..-/ -/ -../ .-/ -/ ./ -../ / -/ ./ -.-./ ..../ -./ ---/ .-../ ---/ --./ -.--/ / .-/ -./ -.--/ .--/ .-/ -.--/ .-.-.-/ / ...-.-/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
