At the time of writing, I've not seen these two answered: Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Has Debian explicitly adopted the view that GFDL is completely > non-DFSG-free regardless of its mode of use? If so, which GR(s) has > (have) established this?
I think so. Amongst others, see http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation sent as http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg00007.html No GR is required for a delegated decision (Constitution s8.3, although I can't remember the release team's delegated powers and I didn't find it on the web site). The decision can be reversed in some ways by a GR (s4.1.3), which is what I think the amendment is trying to do, in addition to issuing a confused position statement (s4.1.5). -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
