On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 02:52:01PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Q1.1) Are GFDL licensed works without invariant texts non-free? > > Well, according to the RM team, and some developers (full > disclosure: myself included), yes, they are, even if there is no > explicit infraction of specific portions of our guidelines. > > The release team, a delegated body, has unequivocally stated that > the GFDL licensed works are non-free, with no codicils and riders > about absence of invariant clauses. > > Absent any other action, I am, by my own analysis, and the actions > of the RM team, going to treat these works as non-free -- and this > impacts issue 2.
What sections of the DFSG do you think GFDL documents without invariant sections fail? -- gram -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
