martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > also sprach Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.01.23.2241 +0100]:
>> After reading all the recent posts about the GFDL on debian-vote, I >> hereby propose the following General Resolution and ask for seconds. > I don't have the time these days to follow the entire discussion. > How does your proposal differ from Adeodato's? It doesn't launch into the whole project statement parts and it specifically says that it's intended to reverse a delegate decision about DFDG-freeness rather than leaving it unclear whether it's overriding the DFSG requirement. In other words, the differences are primarily technical (in my view), but the wording is clearer and less ambiguous about what it's trying to accomplish. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
