On 1/25/06, Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 13:04 -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote: > > What would be the point of your proposal? I mean, if this proposal > > won, it would be exactly the same as if the "no GFDL in main at all" > > proposal won. So, why have yet another option?
> My proposal was for the "two separate GRs" setup. > If there is not enough support for the "two separate GRs" setup, then I > will consider modifying my proposal to fit into the "one big GR" setup. > But I first want to see if there is any support. That's ok, I was asking about Nathanael's option, not yours. I understand yours, although I prefer to vote only once (thus, I prefere the 1 GR approach). -- Besos, Marga
