Michael wrote: > > I'm thinking of something like > > http://people.debian.org/~mjr/gr-fdl.txt (24k, only based on originals) > > Uhm, this is a joke, right?
No. I'll thank you to get better at spotting jokes. I expect there are others who agree with aj's text on some points and adeodato's on another. I'd like to have a way to resolve that conflict without it being a choice between voting for text one doesn't support and voting for spending time on further discussion of this. Can we resolve it by balloting by section? Then a full range of views can be used to pick a compromise. Offering many versions of a controversial policy seems reasonably common in advice about Condorcet voting. For example, online: "Voters have a real choice only when offered competing versions of a policy. Not just a tax, yes or no, but several versions of the tax can and should be offered." -- http://accuratedemocracy.com/l_intro.htm Lately, debian votes tend to offer a few polarised alternatives, bundling different decisions together. I'm asking whether we can find a better resolution this time, without running several GRs. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
