Roger Leigh > I think that this behaviour, as well as that on other lists in the > recent past, is making it increasingly necessary that we introduce > some way of enforcing a minimum standard of decency on our lists. [...]
You pillory[1] a man over his -private beliefs about death[2] to the point where he recoils from the project[3], don't answer off-list mail about it and then have the nerve to lecture about "a minimum standard of decency"? Breathtaking. 1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/01/msg00954.html 2. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/01/msg00968.html 3. http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/01/msg00073.html Nevertheless, Craig Sanders's colourful rants break the lists code of conduct far more clearly than posting satire to -devel-announce. Where are the winged angels of vengence? But then, the d-d-a ban didn't look like it was about enforcing the list codes anyway. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
