Em Qua, 2006-02-01 às 23:28 +0200, Anton Zinoviev escreveu: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:11:25PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote: > > Ok, but by being invariant they are turning the documentation into > > non-free documentation. As you say, people won't be able to change it, > > therefore, it's a non-free text. > The modifications that are permited by GFDL are enough to make useful > modifications, that is to adapt the document and to improve it.
I must remeber that, in this case, you're not letting the user judge if something fits or not to his needs. This breaks freedom 1[1], which DFSG3 clearly refers to. > Yes, you can not do whatever you whish but this is not necessarily > the right interpretation of DFSG. Can you please give us references that support your argument? As I said more than three times in this thread, I can show you one document[1] that DFSG clearly refers to which contradicts your interpretation. Can you show me something like this that contradicts my argument? daniel [1] http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
