On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 03:59:14PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 23:29:22 +0200, Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > The 3:1 requirement would be necessary only if you can prove that > > "we insist on modifiability of all parts". > > Procedurally, I think that the 3:1 requirement stays until you > can prove "The license must allow modifications" only talks about > sections that the author says can be modified.
I do not claim that "the license must allow modifications" only talks about sections that the author says can be modified so I don't have to prove it. My interpretation doesn't limit the modifications to some particular sections. I expressed my interpretation in my first message in this thread. I received a clarification by Stallman that I will report in a separate message and you can see that there are no limitations of this sort. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
