Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:47:02PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> If the 3:1 requirement is to mean anything, it must mean that things >> which explicitly *or implicitly* modify foundation documents must >> receive a 3:1 majority. It certainly cannot be limited only to things >> which explicitly modify the text. > > How can we measure "implicitly"? Anything that is not explicit is > obviously open to interpretation. It seems that the GFDL's problematic > clauses, other than invariant sections, don't explicitly violate the > DFSG.
Fortunately, we have a Secretary whose job is making that decision. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
