* Nathanael Nerode [Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:51:33 -0500]: Hi,
> So, does this mean that if this amendment is passed, outlawing storing a copy > of a document with non-world-readable permission is considered an acceptable, > free restriction by the Developers? Really? > I *hope* that this amendment is simply supposed to mean that the Developers > don't believe that the DRM clause imposes such restrictions (despite the fact > that reading it literally, it does). But at the moment, which of these two > positions is being pushed by the amendment is not clear to me. Adeodato? The latter. From the last paragraph in my mail: | I don't see much point in carrying details about the other two issues, | when they don't affect us at all. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Loan-department manager: "There isn't any fine print. At these interest rates, we don't need it." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
