Anthony Towns <[email protected]> writes: > That view, namely "other people may propose ballots that aren't good > enough, and it's my job to stop that", is precisely a supervisory one.
> Personally, I'd rather the secretarial role be as automatic as possible, > even to the point where votes would be run without any human > intervention. I've thought about that before, but I don't have the > inclination to write any code for it. I'd much rather there be someone whose job it is to understand and interpret the constitution and to point out to people when what they're trying to do in a GR doesn't make sense under the constitution, won't have the effect they're aiming for, or will involve complications that they don't realize. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
