On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:38:57 +1100, Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>> the GFDL has a similar provision. you can provide a link to an >>> internet address containing the full document. >> >> Please show me where the GFDL has such a provision. The passage that > i've shown it before. i have no interest in playing your time-wasting > game. go read the archives. You made the assertion that it was sufficient to just include a link to the full document (including invariant sections) or to just the invariant sections here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/02/msg00244.html Thomas Bushnell disagreed with this: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/02/msg00246.html and you tried to justify your assertion by quoting the GFDL: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/02/msg00247.html This is the only post since the GR was presented that I am aware of where you (or anyone else for that matter) tried to defend that position by quoting the GFDL. Both I: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/02/msg00260.html and Thomas: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/02/msg00268.html pointed out that the portion of the GFDL that you quoted is only an exemption from having to provide a transparent copy along with the text. It cannot be used as an exemption from having to include the invariant sections. I do not see any reply to either my or Thomas' posts, and I am not aware of any other post on this issue that quotes from the GFDL. So as it stands, as I see it, there has been no proof presented from the GFDL that allows you to remove the invariant sections from a document and just include a link to the originals. -- Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
