On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:54:58AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Dec 14th, 2.6.8 and 2.4.27 advisories get released, the first > kernel updates for sarge > Dec 17th, 3.1r1 gets released > Dec 20th, 3.1r1 gets announced > > Jan 20th, DSA-946-1 is released for sudo, breaking the buildds, > and introducing critical bugs 349196, 349549, 349587, 349729 > Feb 6th, Joey mails indicating he'd like to release the update > at the end of Feb (27th/28th) or a little bit later at > the end of February. "let me know if this is ok for > you - or if this is not ok for you" > Feb 22nd, I mail both Joey (as SRM) and the security team noting the > queue changes that should happen "with a stable update > coming up"
I note that it took you 16 days to reply, and that you seem to want to build a dependency between a change which is not strictly needed to make a point release (if it were needed, why was it possible to release 3.1r1?) and 3.1r2. May I ask why? Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
