Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:36:42AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > >1. The process "is intended as a last resort" - what steps would > > you take before initiating or supporting it yourself? > > I would need to convince myself of two things: > * that the project as a whole would be clearly better off without > that developer, due to their behaviour > * that the developer was fully aware of the behaviour in question and > had no intention of changing that behaviour
Would you try to mediate - or at least verify mediation attempts - before supporting an expulsion? [...] > >3. Do you think the process should be modified and, if so, how? > > I'm personally satisfied with the process as it stands; I don't see > any major flaws. Would you modify it yourself? I'm not sure. It's a strange combination of whuffie and hierarchy - both things I dislike - but ultimately needs lots of people to judge badly to make an injustice, so is probably more robust than many debian processes. Thanks for your answers, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
