#debian-dpl-debate, last night: 01:44 <+TedWalther> JeroenVW: also, I've started keeping IRC logs, which include your own prejudiced attitudes. 01:46 <+JeroenVW> TedWalther: can you prove one quote where I'm discriminating based on religion? Permission to quote granted hereby 01:47 <+TedWalther> JeroenVW: not in the timeframe of this debate. we can do it later though
This list, today:
> >Would you please now produce, in public, to this list, the evidence
> >you stated to have against each person running for DPL, unedited,
> >with information on how developers can find the examples in question
> >in context wherever possible.
>
> I suggest you hang out on #debian-devel on IRC for a few weeks and
> observe. If you have access to logs, then view what happened over the
> past couple years. I don't have days to spend combing through old logs
> and stripping out little bits and deciding what bits of context to keep
> and which to throw away. The information is all out there.
>
> The things I mentioned are very real, and very systemic. The behavior
> is done casually and persistently.
For those who read Debian lists through Slashdot, what we're seeing here
is a DPL candidate accusing Jeroen, promising to provide evidence, and
then being vague when asked to do it.
Ciao,
Enrico curious to see what the krooger index of Debian instanity[1] will
be this year.
[1] number of people ranking krooger above NOTA.
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
