On 1916-3.820-5.730(4sf), Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [So a GR can state that pi=3,] > No. > > Language, and interpretation thereof, is not an exact science. Math is.
The representation of maths is not much more exact than language in some ways. Two half-daft observations from a statistician: 1. a GR can state that pi=3 without necessarily being right. A GR is a type of popularity contest, not a test of exact science. 2. a GR can state that pi=3 and be right, but make the project use a pretty awkward default number base! (see above) -- MJR/slef Laux nur mia opinio: vidu http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Bv sekvu http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
