[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Ever since the sarge release, an ongoing question has been: what do the DFSG >require for works that are not "programs" as previously understood in >Debian? Thank you for your proposal. While I was thinking about a different proposal (both wider and narrower in scope), I like this and fully support it. I appreciate your attempt in verifying if the majority of developers still believes in the DFSG as it used to be intended until the DFSG-revisionists colonized [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It should be noted that this will still not allow distribution of firmwares used by some popular devices which are freely distributable but not modifiable. Nor will this solve the problem of the Firefox logo, so looks like I will need to propose a new GR myself. But I will not be able to work on it before the winter. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
