MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anthony Towns <[email protected]> >> Since it appears Debian has to make a choice, which would you=20 >> prefer we do for etch? (197 votes) [1] >> Allow sourceless firmware in main 63% >> Delay the release of etch (so that we can support 18% >> loading firmware from non-free) >> Drop support for hardware which requires sourceless 17% >> firmware > > As far as I can see, those choices are not orthogonal. > >> Developer only poll: (83 votes) [2] >> Option 1 Release etch on time >> Option 3 Support hardware that requires sourceless firmware >> Option 2 Do not ship sourceless firmware in main >> Option 4 None of the above > > ...and nor are these.
Ah, right, I forgot: neither orthogonal nor contradicting, just mingled up. One more reason why I didn't vote. Technically, we can still manage to meet Options 1 to 3 of the DD-only poll, although it's highly unlikely. Options 1 and 3 in the first poll can be read with a "for etch only" attached or without, making them either o Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
