On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 11:32:51AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >While I still believe that this proposal represents a reasonable position > >for the project to take, the discussion over the past two weeks makes it > >clear to me that a large enough fraction of our developership disagrees > >strongly with this interpretation that it's not in the best interest of the > >project to push forward with this proposal. > So what? A large enough fraction of our developership disagrees strongly > with the current interpretation as well.
Would you care to put a number behind this : "large enough fraction" ? How much is it really ? From the posts here we have evidence of maybe 1% or so, not more. Seriously, let this stay for now, vote on Frederik's GR for granting an exception for etch, so we can work on etch on a timely fashion, and then participate in the debate Anthony proposed, which would culminate at the in-person discussion during debconf'07 in Edinbourg. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
