On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:08:17PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > If aj's stops beeing a member of dunc-tank, and do not works publicily > for that dunc-tank, then I remove my second here, he can stay as DPL. > If he prefers dunc-tank, and work for it, he must not be a delegate > anymore, and especialy not DPL.
Is this a suitable compromise? Are there enough people upset with dunc-tank to even try to reach a compromise on the issue? Obiviously, this is a divisive issue, but I'm not sure how many people are upset by it. Would others who are have seconded this proposal, and/or others who are considering raising or secoding proposals about the dunc-tank project be satisfied if aj is not involved with dunc-tank project? Or, is the fact that it could still be run by Debian developers (sans aj) still a problem? Aj, what are your thoughts on not being involved with dunc-tank? Would the project still have a chance to meet its goals? -- gram -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
