On Sat, Sep 23, 2006, Clint Adams wrote: > If Company X bribes you to break libstat-lsmode-perl, there are roughly > a thousand people that can upload a fix. If Company Y bribes you to > remove all the files from pkg-perl's svn repo, there are dozens of > people who can revert this, and roughly a thousand who can NMU the > relevant perl packages in the meantime. lintian is a similar situation. > If Company Z bribes you to not make QA uploads, no one will notice. > > Now, if you become the release manager, and your employer makes your > compensation contingent on Debian not releasing before February of 2010, > no one can NMU the release. Theoretically, we could replace you, but > we cannot fix the problem directly.
You list risks of bribes of various people working on Debian. How did this change with dunc tank? Are you claiming that dunc tank is a mean to disguise bribes? I fail to see why the problems you describe were not problems two months or two years ago. -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
