On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 10:55:59PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:47:22PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > 4 does not seem to account for the fact that removing such firmware may mean > > having to choose between losing support for certain hardware in our > > installer, and releasing etch according to schedule. Did you mean for 4 to > > say "remove as much non-free firmware as time allows without negatively > > impacting the installer", or something like that?
> I did not. Providing support for users that need non-free software is > generally done on a best-effort basis and this GR does not need to hammer > the point. I am quite open to wording improvement, though. Well, I don't see any benefit to spending time improving the wording in this case, since I would vote against it for this reason. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
