On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:04:28PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, we have now two choices : > > > [...] > > B) we do a single ballot : > > > > [ ] non-free firmware belong in non-free (don) > > [ ] non-free firmware can be accepted in main (josselin) (needs 3:1) > > [ ] make an exception for etch (frederik) > > [ ] further discussion > > For me, this is orthogonal. I want both 1 and 3 to be accepted, and 2 > to be rejected. However, if I could only choose between 1 and 2, I'd > would have to vote 2 over 1, since releasing etch is my priority. Err, > free software is my priority, too - I wouldn't have a proper choice > except rating both below "further discussion". > > Furthermore, if the voting results in 3 beating both, we won't have a > proper statement about the post-etch situation, because both the pro-1 > and the pro-2 group will still believe that in an isolated vote. > Especially if 2 beats 1, but misses the 3:1 majority...
pro-1 is indeed just the status quo, this is also why i prefer the separate vote. > In summary, since these issues are orthogonal, I'd rather vote > separately. Now, the question is, on which do we vote first, or can we have two votes together ? Also, we could cross-product them : [ ] non-free belongs in non-free + exception for etch (don+fs) [ ] non-free belongs in non-free + delay etch (don only) [ ] make a longer-term exception for non-free firmware in main (josselin). (since 3 is a superset of frederiks's proposal, doing josselin+fs is not warranted). This means a re-writing of the proposals, as well as new seconds and stuff though. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
