martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > also sprach MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.30.1107 +0100]: > > If that impression is accurate, it means the DPL is not making > > "decisions which are consistent with the consensus of the opinions > > of the Developers" as he was elected to do. That is to say: this > > trouble is partly the DPL's fault. > > Please go read my post again. I said a *minority* is making *most* > of the noise. That has nothing to do with the DPL.
I have reread the post. I still claim that if for every 20 posting, there are 80 more, then any discontent posted *may* signify a much larger group of discontents. Unless there's some extra knowledge about how the visible 20 relates to the hidden 80, Pareto tells one little about the views of the 100. > > > So far, I stand firmly behind aj in all of his decisions. I am > > > glad to see a DPL in charge who is looking for ways to shake up > > > the project before we rust or lose touch with reality. > > > > Lose touch with reality? Seems a bit late for that, when there > > are DDs claiming to be glad to have a disruptive DPL who they say > > is just looking for ways to cause trouble, while also whinging > > about the disruption! > > I neither said disruption nor trouble. Indeed, you in particular wrote "shake up" and "waste of time". -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
