Le lundi 12 février 2007 à 19:35 +1000, Anthony Towns a écrit : > > There are different levels of trusting. One can think that no DD > > would introduce malware in the archive and anyway could think also that > > some > > developers are not good for certain tasks because of attitude/lack of > > skills/lack of time/whatever. > > Or simply because they don't accept/respect/understand the goals other > people are trying to achieve.
Could you explain which goals the buildd administrators are trying to achieve that Aurélien doesn't accept/respect/understand, and for which he shouldn't be trusted? > There's no need for everyone to do that for all goals Debian developers > have, but if you're going to do things that interfere with others' goals > for the distro, you do have to take some care. If you're not willing to > take that degree of care, or find some way of achieving your goals that > doesn't affect other folks work, you'll find you won't be trusted. That > shouldn't be surprising. > > And yes, sometimes it might be better to accept that what you want to do > interfers with other people's directions and do it anyway. But it's not > fair or reasonable to expect other people to like it, or not to rethink > how they work with you. Intellectual masturbation. Again, what are you talking about? -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
