On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 04:18:05PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:31:29AM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > >> Forgot to ask this question: In your opinion, what is a good length of > >> total term for a DPL? > > > > I have always thought that a one-year term might be too short, since it > > does not allow for too much action by the DPL. However, I never felt > > strongly enough about this to actually take the necessary steps to > > increase the term. > > I was unclear again. I meant, "how many times will you seek > re-election if you are re-elected?"
Oh, okay. I don't feel it's prudent to comment on that right now; many things can happen in a year, and even if I do feel that a one-year term might be too short, fact is that we /do/ have a one-year term now. Whether I will run next year will highly depend on what Debian looks like by then. Since I'm not a fortuneteller, I can't know what Debian will look like one year from now, nor whether I think running then will be a good idea. Having said that, I don't think I won't run again next year if I feel there's something I can do to improve Debian by then. -- <Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
