Hi DPL candidates, The kFreeBSD ports are now in a good enough shape to be included in unstable. Aurélien Jarno got ftpmaster's approval for that during an informal conversation at debconf5 [1] but so far, there's been no progress on this front.
Since then, the SCC split happened and ftp-master moved to ries, so adding more architectures to the archive is no longer a problem, AIUI. Hence, what is your position on including those new, non-Linux ports ? What would the timeframe be like, according to you ? If an ftpmaster was to charge an amount of money to include the new architectures (as was the case for amd64), what would, according to you, be a reasonable amount ? Thanks, JB. [1] <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/glibc-bsd-devel/2005-July/000453.html> -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
