Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ First of all, apologies for the delayed response; I'm catching up > > after several days of FOSDEM-plague :-( ] > > Hi Mike, > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:50:41AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: >>Hi, >> >>These questions may be skipped by AJ, because the answers are obvious. >> >>What do you think of the dunc-tank initiative ? What do you think are >>the result of the "experiment" ? > > I think that dunc-tank was a very good idea on the part of AJ, a DPL > looking for new ways in which to help the release process.
I'm confused. In your other mail you wrote ,---- | My belief is that the DPL hat is something you can take off. Of | course, the DPL must be very explict in this, but if I take the | dunc-tank issue, which sparked my question, I think aj handled it not | that badly. Maybe he could have been more clear but he most certainly | had the moral right to be involved in dunc-tank. `---- So do you think he was doing it as DPL looking for new ways, or as a DD? Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
