Anthony Towns a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 09:50:24AM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
>>> seems to list under three DDs actively involved in the port,
>> OK, we miss one more current DD listed here.
>
> Yup, though that shouldn't be much of a challenge. The other problem
> is that the list doesn't seem active, so it's not incredibly clear that
> people are actively maintaining the port.
That's not true, here are the numbers of messages posted in the last two
months:
jan feb
debian-68k 197 152
debian-alpha 112 121
debian-amd64 331 159
debian-arm 114 152
debian-bsd 77 64
debian-hppa 77 58
debian-ia64 23 16
debian-mips 57 27
debian-powerpc 93 119
debian-s390 12 9
debian-sparc 84 92
Looking at these number you could see that debian-mips, debian-ia64,
debian-s390 and debian-hppa are generating less traffic than debian-bsd.
BTW, I wonder if we really need a debian-s390 mailing list that almost
only catch spam.
Cheers,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
