On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:34:47PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:29:56PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:03:48AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > > > Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thursday 10 May 2007 10:15, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > > > The expulsion procedure doesn't call for a vote, so your 70:7 > > > > > statistic > > > > > is irrelevant.
> > > > It's also wrong. > > > So what is the count that DAMs received? I mean, if one says that's > > > wrong, > > > then one should know what is right in order to say that. > > I use the 70:7 statistic, after having counted the actual mails to > > -private, leaving out the dubious ones, in order to be fair to the other > > side. > Considering DAMs expressed explicitely that opinions should be sent > directly to them, how can you consider mails to -private as a metric ? The expulsion procedure calls for such statements to be sent to both the DAMs and to -private. So it's reasonable to discount mails from developers who didn't follow directions, isn't it? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
