cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > On Sunday 29 July 2007, Clint Adams wrote:
>> 1. It creates another class of Debian participant when we should be >> striving to have fewer classes. > > Does it really? as pointed out earlier in threads about this we have 900+ > non-DD maintainers. so it seems to me that this "class of Debian > participant" already exists. All the proposal does in that respect is make > the existing relation official. You brought this argument once as a response to a post of mine, and I was too lazy to answer. But since you bring it again, here some questions about the "900+": - Where does this number come from? - Are all of them unique? - How many of them are now DDs? - How many of them have actually a package in our archive? - How many of them are inactive now? And last but not least: please keep in mind that DM in the sense of this proposal is very different from "maintainer of a package in the archive". Cheers, Bastian -- Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de Debian Developer venthur at debian org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
