Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While we're at it, I've long felt that a one-year DPL term is just too > short (because a DPL needs to spend a few months to get worked in, and > can't do all that much when the next election is about to turn up for > fear of being accused to be campaigning, often leaving only slightly > over half a year or so of time for real work to be done). If more people > feel like it, I'll draft up an amendment that turns it into a two-year > term, or so.
I will definitely second such a proposal, unless former DPLs come forward to say that this just wouldn't work for some reason. I've felt the same thing for a while as well. One year isn't much time to get anything done; it's barely enough time to build up the rapport required to start getting things done. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
