On Tuesday 31 July 2007 22:38, Martin Schulze wrote: > FWIW, I believe that 2 years is too long, both for the DPL who may have > to assign much more time to it than now, and for the project that may > suffer under one DPL and would suffer even longer.
I wonder if a better course might not be to keep the term at one year but move the election forward three months. Not many people can commit to a year of being DPL on short notice. Being DPL-in-waiting for a few months allows people to organize their personal lives and also provides time to prepare for the major projects they intend to pursue as DPL. --Mike Bird, non-DD -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
