Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 11:52:58AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > >I agree. No reason was given AFAICS, so I propose: > > From AJ's original mail: > ... > >Likewise, all our other votes have only needed two weeks (or less in > >the case of the recall votes) to resolve, so having an extra week for > >DPL elections seems unnecessary.
I see that as a reason to reduce the voting period, not the election. > >Reducing the DPL election period from 17% of the year to 11% seems > >like a win to me. YMMV. Such arbitrary calculations aren't reasons. One can just as well note that the DPL election period is only approximately 0% of the period where the DPL's decisions can have effects. Regards, -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Experienced webmaster-developers for hire http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ Also: statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, workers co-op. Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
