aj wrote: [...] > ...so much for non-adversarial campaigning, I guess. Why? So far, this is only adversarial questioning of a candidate. It doesn't necessarily require adversarial campaigning in reply. Or is aba campaigning for one of the other candidates?
FWIW, I think each of the candidates have some doubtful debian deeds worth explaining, but there's only one I expect to get all my-way-or-highway-style adversarial if questioned aggressively. With any luck, we'll see in the campaign-only aeons whether that's correct. Oh and I don't really understand the question: why should anyone stop commits into a repository? You could just ask that they're not put on the release management branch without review. Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
