Josip Rodin writes ("Re: Technical committee resolution"):
> Instead, I would suggest to do two things - first, institute a better
> process, one that doesn't so much focus on intricate stalemates (like the
> present 6.2 does), but one that focuses on how to generally get things done
> - such as a mandatory timetable for *everything*, even a very lax one.
> And secondly, make the DPL the oversight and backup option, but for
> *everything*, so that nothing can fall through the cracks. Since the DPL
> represents the developer body, it's simply a just logical fallback.I can see where you're coming from with this, but I'm afraid it won't work. DPLs have typically been reluctant to get involved in deciding disputes - particularly messy ones that others have failed to tackle. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
